A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out between future neighbours in excess of the development of a wall at a coastal internet site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide focus pursuing an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed spouse and children residence at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of planning breaches, environmental considerations, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier plus the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has progressed right into a highly publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over construction functions at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, look for to construct their loved ones residence. The case happens to be emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where development pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of founded inhabitants. According to the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining produced by their potential neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted under setting up permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both people of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their setting up permission by creating a wall beyond the boundaries in their website, resulting in an encroachment on a Specific Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result areas are issue to stringent controls less than European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have Long lasting ecological consequences, specially within a delicate coastal setting like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach of their arranging authorization, and say the wall, which can be partly developed, is in the right posture. Their lawful group has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding in an effort to protect their perspective, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, exactly where views of the sea are both highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary endeavours via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In line with sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-higher water all through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Situations, a picture which includes due to the fact develop into emblematic with the intensity from the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they ended up intended to gather visual proof in the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Occasions claimed, describing how the two Adult men entered the water all through intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm h2o to photograph the website grew to become Just about the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Periods post about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that this sort of steps had been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up covered in detail because of the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 turned commonly searched phrases as audience sought to understand the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court listened to even more submissions on whether or not interim orders needs to be granted to halt building pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial second within the legal timeline.
In the core of the dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve that the wall, as constructed, goes beyond what was approved and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has become described as meticulous in his examination of planning files, maps, and ailments connected towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their motion is inspired by issue for environmental defense and adherence to arranging law. They reject promises that the situation is about preserving a private perspective, insisting alternatively that it is about guaranteeing that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they have described their long-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair merely seeking to create a relatives house in accordance Along with the law. They deny that the wall encroaches over a Distinctive Location of Conservation and say that every one functions are carried out determined by Expert advice and authorized strategies. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the dramatic steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, like moving into the sea in the course of a storm, will not alter the underlying specifics.
The case has also raised broader questions about how preparing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute around development of wall at coastal web-site is becoming a shorthand description for a situation that a lot of observers see as more and more typical. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats has become much more contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier observed that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in area advocacy on arranging and environmental concerns, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really different Specialist backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous Accountant Paul Feely with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Occasions protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-superior drinking water all through a storm to photograph the location Irish Instances and René Collier waded by way of midsection-higher drinking water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting each the Actual physical truth from the coastline as well as the symbolic character with the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much solution.
As the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome continues to be unsure. The court docket ought to identify whether or not the wall as designed complies with scheduling authorization and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Spot of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and planning disorders. Nonetheless the human aspect stays central: neighbours who should live together with each other long once the authorized costs are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design will work at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, although the implications of the case prolong past that handle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition it underscores how speedily an area disagreement can escalate when basic challenges including environmental security and home rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays an area of natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre in the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized issues. Whether or not it can finally be altered, eliminated, or accomplished as prepared will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to one of the most closely watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.